CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/bddLarge/
normalized-bdd-21-2713-15-79-24_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/bddLarge/
normalized-bdd-21-2713-15-79-24_ext.xml
MD5SUM9ba8aee6934293b41abce7daa463ddc3
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.52077
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables21
Number of constraints2713
Maximum constraint arity15
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension2713
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
spider 2008-06-141047576SAT 0.385941 0.39621
Mistral-prime 1.3131047588SAT 1.52077 1.52126
Mistral-option 1.3141047587SAT 1.56676 1.56871
cpHydra k_101047593SAT 1.63975 1.65671
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271047578SAT 1.64375 1.65646
cpHydra k_401047594SAT 1.65375 1.67665
MDG-probe 2008-06-271047577SAT 1.66075 1.67251
mddc-solv 2008-06-091047575SAT 7.03093 7.06353
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1047592SAT 7.30489 7.42029
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261047583SAT 13.35 13.3828
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261047584SAT 14.6708 14.8633
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301047574SAT 29.2656 29.4544
Abscon 112v4 AC1047591SAT 63.0964 63.4284
casper zao1047589SAT 184.045 184.135
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301047572SAT 207.989 209.285
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301047573SAT 330.506 333.705
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131047579? 93.0549 92.8996
Sugar v1.13+picosat1047580? 124.069 124.245
Sugar v1.13+minisat1047581? 132.094 132.855
bpsolver 2008-06-271047582? (problem) 560.595 565.512
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104938? (MO) 7.88 8.02143
galac M1047585? (MO) 1765.67 1777.01
galac E1047586? (MO) 1794.2 1810.21
casper zito1047590? (TO) 1800.15 1806.23

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0