CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-31.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-31.xml
MD5SUM56b53eb000b9a38b129b209264e73a7c
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.056991
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables168
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity18
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension81
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271057881UNSAT 0.056991 0.065337
Mistral-option 1.3141057890UNSAT 0.05799 0.0664599
MDG-probe 2008-06-271057880UNSAT 0.05899 0.066157
Mistral-prime 1.3131057891UNSAT 0.05899 0.0656209
cpHydra k_101057896UNSAT 0.071988 0.078748
cpHydra k_401057897UNSAT 0.074987 0.401826
bpsolver 2008-06-271057885UNSAT 0.115981 0.12358
casper zito1057893UNSAT 0.414936 0.419591
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261057887UNSAT 1.09683 1.15615
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261057886UNSAT 1.18782 1.27639
Sugar v1.13+minisat1057884UNSAT 1.61775 1.70016
Sugar v1.13+picosat1057883UNSAT 1.92571 2.17873
casper zao1057892UNSAT 2.19467 2.2239
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106646? 0.357944 0.368413
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131057882? 252.306 251.009
galac M1057888? (problem) 64.6302 65.0052
galac E1057889? (problem) 68.5226 69.4907
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301057878? (TO) 1800.04 1808.12
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301057879? (TO) 1800.07 1806.62
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301057877? (TO) 1800.09 1818.52
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1057895? (TO) 1800.11 1811.47
Abscon 112v4 AC1057894? (TO) 1800.12 1808.49

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: