CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-2.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-2.xml
MD5SUMcb4befd277beffaebbdc21ad17d951ee
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.06199
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables168
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity22
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension81
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131057849UNSAT 0.06199 0.069101
Mistral-option 1.3141057848UNSAT 0.062989 0.0689109
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271057839UNSAT 0.06299 0.068956
MDG-probe 2008-06-271057838UNSAT 0.063989 0.0703799
cpHydra k_401057855UNSAT 0.072988 0.080509
cpHydra k_101057854UNSAT 0.073988 0.089991
bpsolver 2008-06-271057843UNSAT 0.125979 0.131166
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261057845UNSAT 1.04384 1.09606
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261057844UNSAT 1.15882 1.20666
Sugar v1.13+minisat1057842UNSAT 1.63675 1.75581
Sugar v1.13+picosat1057841UNSAT 1.85172 1.97178
casper zito1057851UNSAT 1.91571 1.96134
casper zao1057850UNSAT 6.71998 6.78357
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1057853UNSAT 37.0994 37.325
Abscon 112v4 AC1057852UNSAT 38.4801 38.8516
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106644? 0.362944 0.368825
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131057840? 1216.66 1214.87
galac M1057846? (problem) 77.0473 77.8106
galac E1057847? (problem) 77.1743 78.0363
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301057837? (TO) 1800.01 1813.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301057836? (TO) 1800.03 1808.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301057835? (TO) 1800.06 1801.83

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: