CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-12.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-12.xml
MD5SUMac7c0d475342b35cf3d84a60d71b9c13
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.068988
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables168
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity22
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension81
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131057807UNSAT 0.068988 0.0749081
Mistral-option 1.3141057806UNSAT 0.068988 0.074653
MDG-probe 2008-06-271057796UNSAT 0.068989 0.076541
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271057797UNSAT 0.069988 0.0760471
cpHydra k_401057813UNSAT 0.073988 0.105525
cpHydra k_101057812UNSAT 0.080986 0.0821939
bpsolver 2008-06-271057801UNSAT 0.137978 0.14398
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261057803UNSAT 1.12683 1.16702
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261057802UNSAT 1.3128 1.37083
Sugar v1.13+minisat1057800UNSAT 1.68674 1.86444
Sugar v1.13+picosat1057799UNSAT 1.77573 1.89061
casper zito1057809UNSAT 3.05453 3.08815
casper zao1057808UNSAT 10.3804 10.4477
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1057811UNSAT 23.1755 23.35
Abscon 112v4 AC1057810UNSAT 24.3433 24.6407
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301057794UNSAT 122.029 122.677
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301057793UNSAT 122.887 124.079
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301057795UNSAT 125.315 125.649
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106639? 0.338947 0.376647
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131057798? 250.754 249.247
galac E1057805? (problem) 73.4678 74.2339
galac M1057804? (problem) 76.6623 77.4658

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: