CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-26.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-26.xml
MD5SUM9d423c4dbffa3d517f4b6bbf8b79aacd
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.06199
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables168
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity21
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension81
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131057765UNSAT 0.06199 0.0678121
Mistral-option 1.3141057764UNSAT 0.06199 0.0681661
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271057755UNSAT 0.063989 0.0700311
MDG-probe 2008-06-271057754UNSAT 0.06399 0.071714
cpHydra k_401057771UNSAT 0.069989 0.0738501
cpHydra k_101057770UNSAT 0.076987 0.0798899
bpsolver 2008-06-271057759UNSAT 0.130979 0.141258
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261057760UNSAT 1.17682 1.20675
casper zito1057767UNSAT 1.19582 1.20314
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261057761UNSAT 1.21381 1.26277
Sugar v1.13+minisat1057758UNSAT 1.84872 1.96448
Sugar v1.13+picosat1057757UNSAT 1.9807 2.20024
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1057769UNSAT 2.05069 2.09413
Abscon 112v4 AC1057768UNSAT 2.15267 2.20344
casper zao1057766UNSAT 4.84426 4.88155
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301057751UNSAT 105.093 105.664
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301057752UNSAT 109.861 110.449
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301057753UNSAT 129.084 129.248
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106641? 0.31995 0.368288
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131057756? 1509.66 1510.15
galac E1057763? (problem) 73.5298 74.5419
galac M1057762? (problem) 73.7238 74.4866

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: