CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-7.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-7.xml
MD5SUM5175a62a7f0389e4017b8b12a04e7310
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.052991
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables168
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity22
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension81
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141057575UNSAT 0.052991 0.0604739
Mistral-prime 1.3131057576UNSAT 0.054991 0.0606921
MDG-probe 2008-06-271057565UNSAT 0.061989 0.0667069
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271057566UNSAT 0.06199 0.130214
cpHydra k_401057582UNSAT 0.072987 0.0792741
cpHydra k_101057581UNSAT 0.073988 0.156677
bpsolver 2008-06-271057570UNSAT 0.126979 0.133744
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261057572UNSAT 1.01784 1.04988
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261057571UNSAT 1.05684 1.10396
casper zito1057578UNSAT 1.13383 1.14681
Sugar v1.13+minisat1057569UNSAT 1.49877 1.53753
Sugar v1.13+picosat1057568UNSAT 1.66774 1.78962
casper zao1057577UNSAT 4.6183 4.66485
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301057562UNSAT 567.536 570.935
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301057564UNSAT 579.423 584.653
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301057563UNSAT 611.065 616.938
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1057580UNSAT 1058.81 1063.18
Abscon 112v4 AC1057579UNSAT 1111.23 1118.25
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106656? 0.316951 0.367461
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131057567? 1048.53 1050.18
galac M1057573? (problem) 70.9282 72.0366
galac E1057574? (problem) 78.958 79.8195

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: