CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pret/
normalized-pret-60-75_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pret/
normalized-pret-60-75_ext.xml
MD5SUMa0330a090f7498d697bd3145e9396be8
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.508922
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables60
Number of constraints40
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension40
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+picosat1046959UNSAT 0.508922 0.725317
Sugar v1.13+minisat1046960UNSAT 0.541916 0.580986
galac E1046965UNSAT 0.601907 0.875824
galac M1046964UNSAT 0.611906 0.570865
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131046958UNSAT 1.07683 1.1093
Abscon 112v4 AC1046970UNSAT 1.60876 1.5163
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1046971UNSAT 1.68274 1.7204
cpHydra k_101046972UNSAT 8.44172 9.38013
cpHydra k_401046973UNSAT 8.62169 8.77867
Mistral-option 1.3141046966UNSAT 11.6652 11.762
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271046957UNSAT 12.0382 13.261
bpsolver 2008-06-271046961UNSAT 13.5609 13.6203
Mistral-prime 1.3131046967UNSAT 13.5789 13.6589
MDG-probe 2008-06-271046956UNSAT 18.3982 18.4959
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104989UNSAT 25.2592 25.515
mddc-solv 2008-06-091046954UNSAT 32.2121 32.3554
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301046953UNSAT 91.4671 92.193
spider 2008-06-141046955UNSAT 118.378 119.413
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261046962UNSAT 127.654 128.371
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261046963UNSAT 133.421 133.81
casper zito1046969UNSAT 148.731 149.348
casper zao1046968UNSAT 155.069 155.741
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301046951? (TO) 1800.06 1808.92
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301046952? (TO) 1800.09 1801.62

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: