CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/jnhSat/
normalized-jnh301_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/jnhSat/
normalized-jnh301_ext.xml
MD5SUM72ed47ef0bc9063ca630cddd323c2d8e
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.047992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints900
Maximum constraint arity14
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension900
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131046691SAT 0.047992 0.0494479
Mistral-option 1.3141046690SAT 0.050991 0.052771
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271046681SAT 0.055991 0.056161
cpHydra k_401046697SAT 0.057991 0.058219
cpHydra k_101046696SAT 0.05899 0.058323
casper zito1046693SAT 0.169973 0.176443
spider 2008-06-141046679SAT 0.243962 0.247223
MDG-probe 2008-06-271046680SAT 0.318951 0.320568
bpsolver 2008-06-271046685SAT 0.369943 0.373125
mddc-solv 2008-06-091046678SAT 0.698893 0.699602
casper zao1046692SAT 0.709891 0.712094
Sugar v1.13+minisat1046684SAT 1.02584 0.91682
Sugar v1.13+picosat1046683SAT 1.04984 1.07066
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105076SAT 1.12283 1.19062
Abscon 112v4 AC1046694SAT 1.20282 0.99542
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1046695SAT 1.22781 1.04185
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301046677SAT 1.23881 1.19071
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301046676SAT 1.27181 1.16814
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261046686SAT 1.67974 1.62857
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261046687SAT 1.70674 1.5288
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131046682SAT 1.87871 1.29723
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301046675SAT 2.10268 2.00273
galac M1046688SAT 5.83311 5.87568
galac E1046689SAT 5.9121 5.61556

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0