CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-12_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-12_ext.xml
MD5SUMd76a9999252211fb2e42403bdb5d1801
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.024995
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints822
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension822
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271039447UNSAT 0.024995 0.030105
Mistral-prime 1.3131039457UNSAT 0.027995 0.0337009
Mistral-option 1.3141039456UNSAT 0.031994 0.0373991
cpHydra k_401046239UNSAT 0.037993 0.0447361
cpHydra k_101045610UNSAT 0.040993 0.334789
casper zito1043723UNSAT 0.049992 0.0587729
spider 2008-06-141039443UNSAT 0.079987 0.092847
casper zao1043094UNSAT 0.097985 0.106201
MDG-probe 2008-06-271039446UNSAT 0.146977 0.149081
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301039442UNSAT 0.635902 0.652456
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261039452UNSAT 0.701892 0.735017
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104422UNSAT 0.807876 0.846437
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261039453UNSAT 0.833872 0.89898
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044981UNSAT 0.881865 0.936625
Abscon 112v4 AC1044352UNSAT 0.886864 0.937708
galac M1039454UNSAT 0.906861 0.935957
Sugar v1.13+minisat1039450UNSAT 0.91586 1.0375
galac E1039455UNSAT 0.978851 1.01011
Sugar v1.13+picosat1039449UNSAT 1.00585 1.11568
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131039448UNSAT 1.79573 1.80758
bpsolver 2008-06-271039451UNSAT 46.229 46.6304
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301039441? (TO) 1800.05 1815.32
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301039440? (TO) 1800.08 1801.62

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: