CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-13_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-13_ext.xml
MD5SUMb555bdd2cb45a56041f8efbbb1cd6e9e
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.021996
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints822
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension822
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271039428UNSAT 0.021996 0.030149
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271039429UNSAT 0.022995 0.0298159
Mistral-option 1.3141039438UNSAT 0.022995 0.0293131
Mistral-prime 1.3131039439UNSAT 0.023995 0.0301359
cpHydra k_401046238UNSAT 0.033994 0.041654
cpHydra k_101045609UNSAT 0.033994 0.0414579
casper zito1043722UNSAT 0.041993 0.0483059
casper zao1043093UNSAT 0.056991 0.062998
spider 2008-06-141039425UNSAT 0.058991 0.066813
bpsolver 2008-06-271039433UNSAT 0.100984 0.101303
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261039434UNSAT 0.621905 0.682051
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301039424UNSAT 0.631903 0.679465
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104421UNSAT 0.674896 0.559894
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261039435UNSAT 0.809876 0.837835
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044980UNSAT 0.905862 0.939313
galac E1039437UNSAT 0.976851 1.00963
galac M1039436UNSAT 0.995847 1.03974
Abscon 112v4 AC1044351UNSAT 1.00485 1.04766
Sugar v1.13+minisat1039432UNSAT 1.08883 1.17648
Sugar v1.13+picosat1039431UNSAT 1.20082 1.32061
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131039430UNSAT 1.3068 1.3442
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301039423? (TO) 1800 1805.12
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301039422? (TO) 1800.02 1809.43

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: