CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/coloring/
normalized-geom-40-3-ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/coloring/
normalized-geom-40-3-ext.xml
MD5SUM38c956e2ef1782d743e333f7c4cac2d4
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.005998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints78
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size3
Number of constraints which are defined in extension78
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038565UNSAT 0.005998 0.013903
Mistral-option 1.3141038574UNSAT 0.007997 0.0139221
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038564UNSAT 0.007998 0.014687
Mistral-prime 1.3131038575UNSAT 0.008998 0.013981
casper zito1043674UNSAT 0.008998 0.017034
spider 2008-06-141038561UNSAT 0.009997 0.018618
casper zao1043045UNSAT 0.011997 0.017439
cpHydra k_101045561UNSAT 0.017996 0.025814
cpHydra k_401046190UNSAT 0.018996 0.025771
bpsolver 2008-06-271038569UNSAT 0.030995 0.039367
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104373UNSAT 0.288955 0.328545
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038560UNSAT 0.331949 0.373325
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038571UNSAT 0.383941 0.421957
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038570UNSAT 0.396939 0.421478
galac E1038573UNSAT 0.511921 0.529237
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038568UNSAT 0.560914 0.646821
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038567UNSAT 0.58091 0.653008
galac M1038572UNSAT 0.641901 0.676095
Abscon 112v4 AC1044303UNSAT 0.673897 0.737417
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044932UNSAT 0.675896 0.741257
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038566UNSAT 0.710891 0.762178
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038559? (TO) 1800.02 1808.62
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038558? (TO) 1800.1 1805.23

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: