CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford/
normalized-slangford-3-11-ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford/
normalized-slangford-3-11-ext.xml
MD5SUM540723c3977a7f4946311e21f518088e
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.24581
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables33
Number of constraints572
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size33
Number of constraints which are defined in extension572
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
cpHydra k_401046141UNSAT 1.24581 1.24768
Mistral-prime 1.3131037693UNSAT 1.3098 1.32623
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271037683UNSAT 1.3448 1.35626
cpHydra k_101045512UNSAT 1.35979 1.37391
Mistral-option 1.3141037692UNSAT 1.39679 1.41901
MDG-probe 2008-06-271037682UNSAT 1.85172 1.8726
bpsolver 2008-06-271037687UNSAT 2.36564 2.37341
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261037689UNSAT 3.3095 3.37737
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261037688UNSAT 6.04808 6.17268
Abscon 112v4 AC1044254UNSAT 7.16391 7.24215
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044883UNSAT 7.18791 7.30357
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301037678UNSAT 9.42357 9.54689
Sugar v1.13+minisat1037686UNSAT 11.1553 11.3869
galac E1037691UNSAT 13.6559 13.8068
Sugar v1.13+picosat1037685UNSAT 14.9687 15.0525
galac M1037690UNSAT 19.671 19.9147
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131037684UNSAT 37.6183 37.8354
spider 2008-06-141037679UNSAT 41.9486 42.3081
casper zito1043625UNSAT 89.6894 90.3914
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104324UNSAT 145.631 147.094
casper zao1042996UNSAT 291.228 291.538
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301037677? (TO) 1800.01 1804.62
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301037676? (TO) 1800.01 1813.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: