CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford/
normalized-langford-3-11-ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford/
normalized-langford-3-11-ext.xml
MD5SUMaa3180c3777a7d99fa781939f9a51590
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.16182
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables33
Number of constraints550
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size33
Number of constraints which are defined in extension550
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141037674UNSAT 1.16182 1.17491
Mistral-prime 1.3131037675UNSAT 1.16782 1.17883
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271037665UNSAT 1.17382 1.18987
cpHydra k_101045511UNSAT 1.20282 1.22731
cpHydra k_401046140UNSAT 1.21381 1.22912
MDG-probe 2008-06-271037664UNSAT 1.60176 1.62361
bpsolver 2008-06-271037669UNSAT 2.27765 2.3012
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261037671UNSAT 2.83057 2.87244
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261037670UNSAT 5.00924 5.11393
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044882UNSAT 7.1899 7.35013
Abscon 112v4 AC1044253UNSAT 7.29089 7.34445
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301037660UNSAT 9.35458 9.5002
Sugar v1.13+minisat1037668UNSAT 10.2744 10.4075
galac M1037672UNSAT 11.6872 11.8308
Sugar v1.13+picosat1037667UNSAT 12.7421 12.9039
galac E1037673UNSAT 13.8939 14.0955
spider 2008-06-141037661UNSAT 37.4603 37.9274
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131037666UNSAT 38.0732 38.1292
casper zao1042995UNSAT 77.7202 78.977
casper zito1043624UNSAT 83.5663 85.2278
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104323UNSAT 128.27 128.277
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301037659? (TO) 1800.08 1803.32
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301037658? (TO) 1800.09 1812.83

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: