CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/BH-4-4/
normalized-BlackHole-4-4-e-9_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/BH-4-4/
normalized-BlackHole-4-4-e-9_ext.xml
MD5SUM23421a5d9bb5b7ebbeb2d222bbb65547
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.015996
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables64
Number of constraints431
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension431
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271037305UNSAT 0.015996 0.024105
Mistral-prime 1.3131037315UNSAT 0.016996 0.0238949
MDG-probe 2008-06-271037304UNSAT 0.017996 0.0247299
Mistral-option 1.3141037314UNSAT 0.018996 0.0241961
cpHydra k_101045491UNSAT 0.026995 0.0370299
cpHydra k_401046120UNSAT 0.027995 0.035557
bpsolver 2008-06-271037309UNSAT 0.075988 0.0822611
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261037311UNSAT 0.564913 0.57203
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261037310UNSAT 0.729888 0.786933
Abscon 112v4 AC1044233UNSAT 0.816874 0.836016
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044862UNSAT 0.859869 0.898477
Sugar v1.13+minisat1037308UNSAT 0.97785 1.08493
Sugar v1.13+picosat1037307UNSAT 1.02484 1.18103
galac M1037312UNSAT 1.2798 1.32164
galac E1037313UNSAT 1.40379 1.44569
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301037300UNSAT 1.84472 1.87928
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131037306UNSAT 1.9777 2.0519
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104303UNSAT 2.36564 2.41972
casper zito1043604UNSAT 2.73358 2.78803
casper zao1042975UNSAT 5.09623 5.11821
spider 2008-06-141037301UNSAT 437.595 440.419
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301037299? (TO) 1800.03 1813.32
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301037298? (TO) 1800.09 1813.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: