CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/BH-4-4/
normalized-BlackHole-4-4-e-4_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/BH-4-4/
normalized-BlackHole-4-4-e-4_ext.xml
MD5SUM7316dbca1009797fb38beaefc4a359b5
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.015996
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables64
Number of constraints431
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension431
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141037296UNSAT 0.015996 0.0236551
Mistral-prime 1.3131037297UNSAT 0.016996 0.024095
MDG-probe 2008-06-271037286UNSAT 0.016996 0.0246849
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271037287UNSAT 0.017996 0.0240111
cpHydra k_401046119UNSAT 0.028995 0.035184
cpHydra k_101045490UNSAT 0.028995 0.0362469
bpsolver 2008-06-271037291UNSAT 0.075987 0.0813709
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261037292UNSAT 0.557914 0.574894
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261037293UNSAT 0.689894 0.736017
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044861UNSAT 0.800877 0.835602
Abscon 112v4 AC1044232UNSAT 0.827873 0.901137
Sugar v1.13+picosat1037289UNSAT 0.98185 1.1007
Sugar v1.13+minisat1037290UNSAT 1.06084 1.18317
galac M1037294UNSAT 1.3358 1.39465
galac E1037295UNSAT 1.64075 1.71869
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301037282UNSAT 1.71474 1.7461
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131037288UNSAT 1.79773 1.80431
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104302UNSAT 2.50462 2.55241
casper zito1043603UNSAT 2.78957 2.81486
casper zao1042974UNSAT 5.43317 5.48644
spider 2008-06-141037283UNSAT 450.615 454.459
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301037280? (TO) 1800.05 1805.42
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301037281? (TO) 1800.07 1816.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: