CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/frb50-23/
normalized-frb50-23-5-mgd_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/frb50-23/
normalized-frb50-23-5-mgd_ext.xml
MD5SUM3ed84f5aad08c708826e9ed69a6c018c
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark114.342
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints428
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size23
Number of constraints which are defined in extension428
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301036848SAT 114.342 115.396
Mistral-option 1.3141036864SAT 497.023 497.839
MDG-probe 2008-06-271036854SAT 857.956 863.606
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271036855SAT 873.609 880.256
Mistral-prime 1.3131036865SAT 892.124 894.838
cpHydra k_101045466? (TO) 1800 1802.53
cpHydra k_401046095? (TO) 1800.01 1825.93
galac E1036863? (TO) 1800.03 1810.71
spider 2008-06-141036851? (TO) 1800.04 1814.31
casper zito1043579? (TO) 1800.05 1808.81
Sugar v1.13+picosat1036857? (TO) 1800.05 1811.42
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044837? (TO) 1800.07 1807.23
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261036861? (TO) 1800.07 1814.25
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301036849? (TO) 1800.07 1807.82
Sugar v1.13+minisat1036858? (TO) 1800.08 1806.92
casper zao1042950? (TO) 1800.08 1808.32
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104278? (TO) 1800.09 1801.31
galac M1036862? (TO) 1800.09 1814.11
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131036856? (TO) 1800.09 1809.48
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301036850? (TO) 1800.09 1816.32
bpsolver 2008-06-271036859? (TO) 1800.09 1811.72
Abscon 112v4 AC1044208? (TO) 1800.11 1804.37
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261036860? (TO) 1800.17 1811.68

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 16 2 7 19 2 16 16 18 7 22 19 12 20 4 21 7 15 10 8 19 5 12 19 11 5 20 6 1 6 0 14 18 22 21 10 22 17 0 4 10 11 19 16 16 17 11 5 2 20