CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/frb50-23/
normalized-frb50-23-1_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/frb50-23/
normalized-frb50-23-1_ext.xml
MD5SUM96cbf3d1ea03405661042452fc7ca9d0
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark146.492
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints544
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size23
Number of constraints which are defined in extension544
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301036740SAT 146.492 146.578
Mistral-prime 1.3131036757SAT 695.497 697.656
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271036747? (TO) 1800.03 1802.61
casper zao1042944? (TO) 1800.04 1814.41
galac E1036755? (TO) 1800.05 1814.41
cpHydra k_401046089? (TO) 1800.05 1813.13
casper zito1043573? (TO) 1800.05 1808.11
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261036753? (TO) 1800.06 1800.75
galac M1036754? (TO) 1800.07 1808.81
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104272? (TO) 1800.08 1800.91
cpHydra k_101045460? (TO) 1800.08 1823.34
MDG-probe 2008-06-271036746? (TO) 1800.08 1807.71
Mistral-option 1.3141036756? (TO) 1800.09 1806.51
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044831? (TO) 1800.09 1807.16
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131036748? (TO) 1800.1 1806.77
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261036752? (TO) 1800.1 1807.44
Sugar v1.13+minisat1036750? (TO) 1800.1 1806.32
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301036742? (TO) 1800.1 1805.92
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301036741? (TO) 1800.1 1801.92
Sugar v1.13+picosat1036749? (TO) 1800.11 1816.52
spider 2008-06-141036743? (TO) 1800.11 1805.41
bpsolver 2008-06-271036751? (TO) 1800.12 1801.62
Abscon 112v4 AC1044202? (TO) 1800.15 1807.63

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
6 5 2 13 20 4 10 21 2 9 12 2 9 14 0 15 1 19 14 13 20 20 8 7 4 13 8 9 8 9 22 14 17 7 19 5 22 21 14 21 8 8 22 9 2 4 19 22 13 17