CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-27/
normalized-rand-27-27-351-163-63021_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-27/
normalized-rand-27-27-351-163-63021_ext.xml
MD5SUM63094bb3e0d5b7671c766ca5de694f92
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark101.245
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables27
Number of constraints351
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size27
Number of constraints which are defined in extension351
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301035066SAT 101.245 102.273
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044738SAT 364.665 364.942
cpHydra k_401045996SAT 370.103 374.004
Abscon 112v4 AC1044109SAT 391.378 392.979
MDG-probe 2008-06-271035072SAT 423.283 426.931
bpsolver 2008-06-271035077SAT 603.986 604.22
Mistral-option 1.3141035082SAT 633.102 637.888
cpHydra k_101045367SAT 1001.75 1002.14
Mistral-prime 1.3131035083SAT 1011.48 1012.17
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271035073SAT 1055.26 1064.22
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261035079SAT 1230.45 1231.24
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261035078SAT 1304.28 1313.87
galac M1035080? (TO) 1800.01 1817.12
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301035067? (TO) 1800.01 1811.42
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301035068? (TO) 1800.03 1815.52
galac E1035081? (TO) 1800.08 1805.12
spider 2008-06-141035069? (TO) 1800.09 1802.61
Sugar v1.13+minisat1035076? (TO) 1800.1 1801.32
casper zito1043480? (TO) 1800.1 1802.71
casper zao1042851? (TO) 1800.1 1805.11
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104179? (TO) 1800.1 1814.51
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131035074? (TO) 1800.12 1800.29
Sugar v1.13+picosat1035075? (TO) 1800.12 1817.62

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
7 5 7 22 11 25 0 8 20 2 3 20 26 10 12 14 14 13 18 24 3 16 15 23 5 26 20