CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-15/
normalized-qcp-15-120-13_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-15/
normalized-qcp-15-120-13_ext.xml
MD5SUMe163336b7fd297141773c350ceb1e4d5
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.67074
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables225
Number of constraints2520
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension2520
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+picosat1034157UNSAT 1.67074 1.47624
Sugar v1.13+minisat1034158UNSAT 1.74573 1.53444
galac M1034162UNSAT 1.81572 1.97842
galac E1034163UNSAT 2.00269 2.06827
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261034161UNSAT 2.12468 2.20137
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261034160UNSAT 2.18167 2.28257
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131034156UNSAT 3.18551 3.22186
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271034155UNSAT 6.28804 6.34618
Mistral-prime 1.3131034165UNSAT 8.02078 8.04961
cpHydra k_101045316UNSAT 9.71752 9.9659
MDG-probe 2008-06-271034154UNSAT 12.4491 12.5629
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044687UNSAT 17.1604 17.2293
Mistral-option 1.3141034164UNSAT 18.6912 18.7524
Abscon 112v4 AC1044058UNSAT 29.8125 29.9524
cpHydra k_401045945UNSAT 38.4442 39.1032
casper zito1043429UNSAT 88.2956 88.331
bpsolver 2008-06-271034159UNSAT 98.3041 98.5226
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301034150UNSAT 150.956 151.447
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104128UNSAT 156.892 158.45
spider 2008-06-141034151UNSAT 173.665 174.217
casper zao1042800UNSAT 338.257 339.686
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301034148? (TO) 1800.06 1802.12
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301034149? (TO) 1800.07 1800.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: